MODULE 3 · LESSON 3.5
Understanding Routine Health Information Reporting
Estimated time: 25 minutes
3.5.1 What is routine reporting?
Routine reporting is the regular submission of information according to an established schedule. A programme may require participating facilities to submit monthly service summaries. The reporting process allows health managers to review information across facilities and reporting periods.
3.5.2 Reporting completeness
Reporting completeness asks whether the expected reports have been received. Suppose 18 out of 20 expected facility reports were received. 18 ÷ 20 × 100 = 90%. This tells us that 90% of the expected reports were received. It does not tell us whether the reports contain accurate figures.
3.5.3 Reporting timeliness
Reporting timeliness asks whether reports were submitted within the specified deadline. Suppose 15 out of 20 expected reports were received by the deadline. 15 ÷ 20 × 100 = 75%.
Completeness and timeliness answer different questions. A report can be received but submitted late.
3.5.4 Why routine reports can contain problems
- Missing facility reports.
- Late submissions.
- Incomplete fields.
- Inconsistent indicator definitions.
- Incorrect aggregation.
- Duplicate submissions.
- Data-entry errors.
- Differences between source registers and summary reports.
3.5.5 What should an analyst do?
- Confirm the reporting period.
- Check the indicator definition.
- Verify whether the report was expected.
- Examine the source records or supporting documentation where authorised.
- Investigate discrepancies.
- Document corrections and unresolved issues.
- Report limitations honestly.
Suggested answers
- A programme expected 30 facility reports. Twenty-four were received. Eighteen were received by the deadline. What is reporting completeness, and what is reporting timeliness, using all 30 expected reports as the denominator?
Lesson summary
Routine health reporting provides regular information about service delivery and programme activity. Reporting completeness, timeliness and accuracy are distinct dimensions. Each must be interpreted appropriately.